Maui High Band Booster Club

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
990304192
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2018, Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Kahului, HI, USA
Phone
8087274096
Rating
89
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$182,355
Expenses
$171,182
Assets
$115,516

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

16 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • LINDA MONDEN (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • LINDA MONDEN (PRESIDENT)
  • KRISTINA TOSHIKIYO (VICE PRESIDE)
  • LEANNE OTA (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To assist the band director in providing students with the opportunity for musical experiences, create community awareness and introduce students to art and music culture.

What it reported doing in 2024

Concert band - the band performs free concerts during the holiday season at schools and shopping malls as a community service. The band's concert season is highlighted by their annual spring concert in april at the maui arts and cultural center and an aloha concert in may of each year. The band hosts the maui district high school band festival, which gathers high school bands across the island for a series of performances. The festival includes an honor band whose members are selected by audition. All performances are free of charge. The band incurs expense for venues, uniforms, music, and various other operational costs.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 71% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 76% for direct work, and 24% for grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 88
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 44
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 86%; rating input score 86
  • Program expense ratio: 91.6%; rating input score 92

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 6.1%; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.67; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 22.5% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -1.4% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 4.4% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 86% of revenue deployed · 91.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $157K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 16 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 50/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 46/100.