Matthews Elementary School Pto

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
561799375
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2013–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Matthews, NC, USA
Phone
9196325705
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Parent/Teacher Group

Reported finances

Revenue
$30,034
Expenses
$46,283
Assets
$22,684

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CHERYL MASCIERE (CO-PRESIDENT)
  • JULIANA GANDARILLA (CO-PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • SARA LUKETICH (EX-OFFICIO)
  • CHERYL MASCIERE (CO-PRESIDENT)
  • EMILY MATTHEWS (3RD VICE PRE)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Child advocacy

What it reported doing in 2024

Provided the following: 1. Beginning of year classroom funds for teachers 2. Book nook & classroom libraries 3. Staff appreciation breakfast & lunches 4. Supplies needed for: kindergarten family ice cream social; multicultural night; health room; end of year ice cream celebration for all students; field trips 5. Boosterthon projects: literacy materials for all grades; replacement heavy duty indoor rugs for entrances with school logo; outdoor rugs for entrances with school logo; professionally installed fence around baseball field/track area; additional painting for columns and cafeteria (touch ups) 6. T-shirts for student activities: boosterthon; battle of the books; blue/gold (field day) 7. Fundraisers: boosterthon; school store; stingerfest; spirit nights (restaurants)

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 90% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 21
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -54.1%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.49; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -5.6% per year; rating input score 0; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -6.6% per year; rating input score 0; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -2.3% per year; rating input score 0; 31st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $52K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 6 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2013 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 12/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 29/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.