Matthew Shepard Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
311640047
IRS 990 coverage
2012–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Casper, WY, USA
Phone
3038307400
Rating
76
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Civil Liberties

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,169,267
Expenses
$1,351,125
Assets
$1,044,754
Liabilities
$45,577

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JUDY SHEPARD (CHAIR/PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • JUDY SHEPARD (CHAIR/PRESIDENT): $129,174 total reported compensation
  • WARREN GREENE (DIR. OF OPERATIONS): $83,550 total reported compensation
  • DANA JUNIEL (VP STRATEGY & COMM. (THRU 03/24)): $23,367 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To erase hate by replacing it with understanding, compassion and acceptance and to educate and enlighten others on the importance of diversity, understanding, compassion, acceptance, and respect. The foundation works to support the teaching and use of artistic and literary works that illustrate the importance of equality and inclusivity and the role of individuals in countering hatred and bias; strives to prevent similar tragedies by providing a victim's perspective in the local and national training of peace ocers, prosecutors, and the public on hate crime prevention, enforcement, and reporting; and provides an online community for lgbtq+ and allied youth to use their voices to demonstrate their authentic lived experiences through stories and resources designed to serve their needs and interests.

What it reported doing in 2024

Public outreach - matthew's legacy is highlighted through multiple artistic works inspired by his story, including "the laramie project", "considering matthew shepard and "matt shepard is a friend of mine". Msf helps to support the numerous performances and productions around the world by offering 2 cards & letters lobby exhibit options, a poster of the iconography artwork of matt housed at the Washington national cathedral in Washington, d.c., as well as supplying our purple "erase hate" wristbands for the cast, singers and crew. Beyond providing the above resources, we share digitized resources of photos, news articles, historical context and supporting documents.resource package count: 58areas served: Washington dc, Wisconsin, Colorado, Iowa, newjersey, Rhode Island, Pennsylvania, Maine, Florida, Virginia, newyork, North Carolina, Ohio, California, Oregon, Washington, Maryland, Indiana, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Nevada, Illinois, Georgia, Texas, West Virginia, Michigan, tasmania (aus), nova scotia (can), ontario (can), alberta (can), new zealandas part of our legacy works resource packages, we offer schools, theaters and choirs the ability to have cast/choir chats with dennis shepard. He also does talk-backs after performances with the audience. At times, judy shepard is also available to join. This resource is an exclusive offering from msf and gives both those involved in productions and performances, as well as the audience, a personal perspective and story that only the shepards can provide about matt's life and legacy. By getting this personalized experience, all those involved are better able to appreciate the works and to carry the message of matt's legacy and erasing hate into their communities and lives.during this period, msf provided the following: the laramie project cast chats: 26areas served: Arizona, New York, Illinois, Florida, Nevada, New Jersey, California, New Hampshire, Washington, Pennsylvania, Iowa, Colorado, Maine, Massachusetts, ontario (can), singapore, tasmania (aus)the laramie project audience talk-backs: 7areas served: Nevada, California, Pennsylvania, Iowa, new jerseyconsidering matthew shepard choir chat: 5areas served: New York, New Jersey, Virginia, Texas, pennsylvaniaconsidering matthew shepard audience talk-backs: 3areas served: Texas, Pennsylvania, new yorkpublic outreach speaking engagements -judy and dennis shepard were involved in 14 speaking engagements and events sharing matt's story in an effort to change hearts and minds. Presentations ranged in topic, but focused on matt's legacy and messages of belonging, equity and erasing hate, lgbtq+ rights and advocacy, and hate crime prevention. These presentations were done with high schools, universities, employee resource groups, law enforcement, pride events and governmental agencies.areas served: Pennsylvania, Florida, Texas, New York, Minnesota, Wyoming, Washington dc, Massachusetts, Washington, Virginia, California, alabamapublic outreach hate crime prevention training -msf partners with out to protect, a national leader in hate crime prevention training for law enforcement. During this report period, msf provided scholarships to law enforcement and first responders in the following courses: hate crime prevention scholarships 84lgbt liaison training scholarships 57lgbt liaison in-person academy weekend 15public outreach erase hate and laramie project curriculum -msf finalized 2 curriculum that will be offered at no cost to schools and educational institutions.the laramie project curriculum is a 9-week course study, broken up into 3 units, for grades 8-12. This curriculum consists of lesson plans, handouts, and slides to be used for learning before, during and after reading the laramie project.the erase hate curriculum consists of 4 units, all 9 weeks in length. This curriculum is for grades 8-12. The erase hate curriculum teaches about matts legacy and will teach youth how to take action and erase hate.the laramie project curriculu

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 93% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 97% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 67
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 78
  • Sustainability: 24
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 77.4%; rating input score 77
  • Program expense ratio: 67.8%; rating input score 68
  • Fundraising efficiency: $4.54 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 71.4%; rating input score 71; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -15.6%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.77; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 17.5%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 5.6% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5.2% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 8.9% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 77.4% of revenue deployed · 67.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 5 of 7 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $916K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $129K · 8 people listed
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $111K reported
  • Consistency: 35 of 35 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2012 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 15/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 12/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 35/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 18/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 54/100.