Matthew O Jones Family Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
814686881
IRS 990-PF coverage
2018–2024
Forms available
Form 990-PF 2024
Location
Vista, CA, USA
Phone
9493002900
Rating
55
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Human Services N.E.C.

Reported finances

Revenue
$56,287,854
Expenses
$203,820

Source: IRS Form 990-PF. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Overview

Mission

Human Services N.E.C.

What it reported funding in 2024

The foundation reported 5 filed grant rows totaling $45,000. The stated grant purposes included in support of assisting foster teenagers in their endeavor to become confident, productive, contributing, educated adults., in support of preserving, protecting, and sharing the natural and cultural resources of the san dieguito river valley., and bonsall woman's club (bwc) directs its energy and resources for the betterment of our community. the club places special emphasis on promoting and supporting local organizations through financial contributions and personal service. through volunteerism, training and fellowship, our members' lives are enriched by individual growth and development. dedicated to charitable and educational purposes, the bwc is a nonprofit charitable organization under section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code., plus 2 other reported purposes.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 98% of the foundation's positive operating resources came from contributions.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The foundation distributed 100% of its reported charitable disbursements as grants.
  • Includes asset-sale income: Asset-sale income is shown separately from recurring resources when classifying the revenue model.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and the filing identifies who received its grants. A relatively small share of available resources goes to charitable grants and a relatively small share of spending goes to grants.

Rating breakdown

  • Grant Deployment: 3
  • Cost Efficiency: 22
  • Transparency: 100
  • Compliance: 100
  • Endowment Health: 98

Detailed rating inputs

Grant Deployment

  • Grant deployment ratio: 2.8%; rating input score 3; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Cost Efficiency

  • Grant expense ratio: 22.1%; rating input score 22; 10th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency

  • Grant recipient disclosure: Yes; rating input score 100

Compliance

  • Foundation activity disclosures: 19 of 19 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Property sale or exchange with a disqualified person: Pass
    • Borrowing from or lending to a disqualified person: Pass
    • Goods, services, or facilities involving a disqualified person: Pass
    • Compensation paid to a disqualified person: Pass
    • Assets transferred to a disqualified person: Pass
    • Payment to a government official: Pass
    • Uncorrected prior self-dealing: Pass
    • Prior-year undistributed income: Pass
    • Excess business holdings: Pass
    • Investments that may jeopardize charitable purposes: Pass
    • Uncorrected prior-year jeopardizing investments: Pass
    • Attempt to influence legislation: Pass
    • Attempt to influence an election: Pass
    • Individual grants for travel, study or similar purposes: Pass
    • Grants outside qualifying charitable organization categories: Pass
    • Spending for a noncharitable purpose: Pass
    • Funds received for a personal-benefit contract: Pass
    • Premiums paid on a personal-benefit contract: Pass
    • Prohibited tax-shelter transaction: Pass
  • Filing consistency checks: 10; rating input score 100

Endowment Health

  • Endowment-health comparison: 1,159.32; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Grants: 100% of grant recipient detail disclosed
  • Payout: 2.8% grant deployment rate
  • Trustees: Filed trustees detail
  • Self-dealing: 100% of reviewed questions answered “No”
  • Investments: 98th percentile for endowment coverage
  • Consistency: 10 of 10 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2018 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Grant Deployment: Grant deployment ratio scored 3/100.
  • High — Cost Efficiency: Grant expense ratio scored 22/100.