Matthew and Mark Evans Foundation and Center

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
933037925
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Scranton, SC, USA
Rating
71
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$46,335
Expenses
$41,765
Assets
$10,766

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

People named in this filing

  • Gloria M Evans (Foundation Director)
  • Joshua Evans (Mental Health Program Director)
  • Dean Morgan (Clergy Care Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

We are a charitable organization. The purpose of our non-profit organization is to bring donors together to provide services for families and individuals experiencing a life crisis including educational medical emotional and mental health needs through a variety of means including coordination with established charities. In addition our mission is to provide a Community Center where services are provided to help families and individuals in stressful situations by providing materials and support groups life coaching or counseling. A major focus of these services being to provide support to clergy members and their families.

What it reported doing in 2025

COMMUNITY CARE PROJECTS- Established Charities- St. Jude Childrens Hospital- 300.00 Samaritans Purse- 300.00 The Manna House-441.06 Turbeville Childrens Home- 900.00 Free Camp of the Pee Dee-300.00 Blue for Barrett-600.00 Royal Home Ministries- 100.00 Homeless Funds used to purchase groceries meals tents medical care clothes and to provide gift cards for individuals for food and supplies. 4147.00. Local Community Needs- Individuals and Families- Funds given via gift card checks payments directly to utility companies or grocery stores food funds for medical care support- cancer treatment and other life crisis events. 5135.32-- 20 families

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 90% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 49
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 35
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 47%; rating input score 47
  • Program expense ratio: 52.1%; rating input score 52

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 9.9%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.26; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 26.8%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 63.9% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 62.8% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 16.1% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 47% of revenue deployed · 52.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $22K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 47/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 52/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 21/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 7/100.