Matthew 2535 Foundation Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
262658110
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2022, Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Danville, KY, USA
Phone
8597574932
Rating
96
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Centers to Support the Independence of Specific Populations

Reported finances

Revenue
$37,174
Expenses
$38,641
Assets
$81,013
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • QUENTIN E SCHOLTZ III (PRESIDENT)
  • RICKY D KIRK (VICE-PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • QUENTIN E SCHOLTZ III (PRESIDENT)
  • RICKY D KIRK (VICE-PRESIDENT)
  • LARRY T CLARK (SECRETARY-TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The purpose of matthew 25:35 foundation, inc. (the foundation) is to serve as a benevolent organization that seeks to help the physical, mental, emotional and spiritual needs of those persons disenfranchised by social structure, economic status, or neglect. We will seek primarily to help children, the disabled and others who have been severely disadvantaged due to social status, religious bias, or impoverishment, both domestically and internationally. We also seek to motivate persons toward greater generosity to and participation in gods work through the work of the foundation.

What it reported doing in 2025

Provided funds in 2025 for children's educational needs in melela, tanzania through the programs in place and administered by the tms global of atlanta, Georgia, the grantee. Grants provided funds for construction of school building and furnishings.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 93% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 51
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 99.3%; rating input score 99

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -3.9%; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.1; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 41.8% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -1.6% per year; rating input score 0; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 1.9% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 99.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $38K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2014 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 36/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.