Mattera Ministries International

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
261329644
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2020, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2013
Location
Staten Island, NY, USA
Phone
9174884374
Rating
80
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Education N.E.C.

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$143,667
Expenses
$111,648
Assets
$66,116
Liabilities
$960

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JOSEPH MATTERA (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • JOSEPH MATTERA (PRESIDENT)
  • PAUL TALAKSON (SECRETARY)
  • THOMAS WALKER (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To advance the kingdom of god on earth by various modes of teaching, training, coaching, consulting and providing for the education of emerging leaders in the nation and the world.

What it reported doing in 2024

Joseph mattera traveled to brazil during the year. He was a keynote speaker and also led workshops for global leaders on how to spread the gospel in all areas of culture. He ministered to many leaders.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 65
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 55
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 59.1%; rating input score 59
  • Program expense ratio: 75.8%; rating input score 76

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 22.3%; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.59; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 14.9%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 12.9% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3.7% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 9.3% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 59.1% of revenue deployed · 75.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $85K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2014 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 59/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 42/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 18/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 39/100.