Mathews-dickey Boys' & Girls' Club

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
436060717
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2020
Forms available
Form 990 2020
Location
St Louis, MO, USA
Phone
3143825952
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Boys Clubs

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$0
Expenses
$3,219,489
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

24 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • THOMAS H SULLIVAN (INTERIM CEO AND PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • LAVICKI HART (BOARD CHAIR)
  • JOHN STUPP III (VICE CHAIR)
  • LINDA GRIFFITH (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

See schedule othe mathews-dickey boys' & girls' club, a non-profit, 501(c)(3) organization, was founded in 1960 by martin luther mathews and the late hubert "dickey" ballentine. Initially, the club was designed to provide structured recreational activities to neighborhood youths. Today, the club's goals are more focused and comprehensive. The mathews-dickey boys' & girls' club's mission is to produce physically active, well-educated and hopeful youth with families at the center of our efforts. Our vision is to place the american dream in the grasp of children and their families by stimulating the pursuit of knowledge, attainment of a healthier life and the skills for greatness.

What it reported doing in 2020

Merger of the organization with another area not-for-profit entity, herbert hoover boys & girls club of st. Louis, which plans to continue to provide similar programs to the children mathews-dickey boys and girls club currently serves.

Operating model

Revenue model
No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 75
  • Transparency & Controls: 93
  • Accountability: 88
  • Sustainability: 8
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 10.2% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -2.8% per year; rating input score 0; 57th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -7.1% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 22 of 22 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $3.2M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 24 people listed
  • Consistency: 13 of 13 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes grants
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2011 to 2020
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.