Maternal Mental Health Now Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
991790214
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Pasadena, CA, USA
Phone
6467042688
Rating
59
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Health - General and Rehabilitative N.E.C.

Reported finances

Revenue
$102,325
Expenses
$1,513
Assets
$102,097
Liabilities
$1,285

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • AMBER SHEIKH (PRESIDENT)
  • KELLY O CONNOR (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

  • AMBER SHEIKH (PRESIDENT)
  • JOSHUA COHEN (TREASURER)
  • EYNAV ACCORRT (BOARD MEMBER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The specific purpose of this corporation is primarily to remove barriers to the prevention, screening and treatment of prenatal and postpartum depression, anxiety and other mental health challenges by working with healthcare providers, health systems and state and local governments to make the prevention, screening and treatment of perinatal anxiety and depression part of the standard prenatal and postpartum care for new parents.

What it reported doing in 2024

Black birth workers - our black birth workers community initiative addresses the physical, economic, and social conditions of the workforce serving approximately 7,000 black birthing people in la county, directly targeting disparities in perinatal mental health outcomes.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 93% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 20
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 89
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0.8%; rating input score 1
  • Program expense ratio: 52.9%; rating input score 53

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 98.5%; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 67.48; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 200% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 200% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 200% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0.8% of revenue deployed · 52.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $800 in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 1/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 53/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 41/100.