Maternal and Child Health Consortium of Chester County Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
232775806
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
West Chester, PA, USA
Phone
6103445370
Rating
90
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Public Health Program (Includes General Health and Wellness Promotion Services)

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,837,305
Expenses
$3,272,667
Assets
$1,620,002
Liabilities
$339,117

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Milena Lanz (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • Allsion Gschwind Richards (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • Milena Lanz (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $146,310 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To advocate for and empower prenatal and parenting families to achieve healthy beginnings and a bright future through a caring culture of service.

What it reported doing in 2025

Family benefits program - support children and families who are involved with, or at risk of involvement with, the child welfare system. Services focus on strengthening parenting skills, increasing family stability, reducing barriers to services, and supporting family-led decision-making. Life skills program: the life skills program provides in-home parenting and family support to families involved with children, youth and families ("cyf"). Services address parenting routines, child safety, hygiene, discipline, budgeting, housing stability, and other skills that promote family well-being. Diversion and triple p programs: the diversion program provides early intervention and supportive services to families at risk of child welfare involvement. The triple p program uses an evidence-based positive parenting curriculum to help caregivers strengthen parenting skills, address behavioral concerns, and promote healthy family relationships. Family group decision making ("fgdm"): fgdm brings together families, natural supports, and service providers to develop family-led plans that promote child safety, stability, and well-being. The process centers family voice and identifies practical supports to help families meet their goals. Language access program: the language access program provides spanish and portuguese interpretation and translation services to support families involved with cyf and related systems. Services are provided in person for meetings, medical appointments, school meetings, and other family-centered needs to promote clear communication and meaningful participation. Family navigator and benefits services: family navigators provide bilingual, individualized assistance connecting families to health care, public benefits, housing, food resources, transportation, education, employment supports, and other community services. Benefits assistance may include support with applications for medicaid, chip, snap, wic, tanf, and other available programs.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 79% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 92
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 19
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 89.5%; rating input score 90
  • Fundraising efficiency: $21.22 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -15.3%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.5; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.21; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 4.5%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 5.9% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.3% per year; rating input score 100; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 0.4% per year; rating input score 100; 11th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 89.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $2.9M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $146K · 9 people listed
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $189K reported
  • Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 6/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 16/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 34/100.