Mater Dei Nursing Home

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
221840494
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2016
Forms available
Form 990 2016
Location
Camden, NJ, USA
Phone
8563424100
Rating
40
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Nursing, Convalescent Facilities

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$357
Expenses
$469
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$993,979

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • John A Craig (PRESIDENT)
  • John A Sarin (Vice president)

Highest reported compensation

  • Lawrence J Reader (treasurer): $133,483 total reported compensation
  • Deacon Gerard Jablonowski (Secretary): $72,952 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Our mission was to operate a not-for-profit catholic based skilled nursing facility providing our residents with the best nursing care and rehabilitation services, while enhancing the quality of life in a dignified, safe atmosphere. We sought to provide appropriate service to all who asked for our assistance. Mater dei ceased operations december 2012.

What it reported doing in 2016

Mater Dei is no longer operating as a Skilled Nursing Facility. Its operations ended in December 2012. It was a 64 bed Skilled Nursing Facility in Newfield, New Jersey. It was last licensed during 2013 by the New Jersey Department of Health and Human Services. The home's sole member was Catholic Charities, Diocese of Camden.previous Resident programs included restorative nursing care by licensed and certified nursing staff, comprehensive plan of care, social service, pharmacy, congregated dining, activities, special diets, spiritual counseling by a Catholic chaplain, housekeeping and laundry.Rehabilitation services, physical, occupational and speech therapies were available for those recovering from fractures, strokes and other short-term, post hospital stays. In addition to core therapies and treatment modalities, we provided a wide range of complex clinical care and specialized services, including: Gait and balance training, dysphasia therapy, IV Antibiotic therapy, enteral nutrition, wound care and pain management.Mater Dei had some revenues and expenses in 2016 due to the winding down of activities.

Operating model

Revenue model
Investment-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 60
  • Sustainability: 17
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 66.7%; rating input score 67; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -31.4%; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 6,616.2%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -102.9% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -44.1% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -32.3% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 4 of 6 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $133K · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 14 of 14 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2010 to 2016
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Related organizations: 5 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 34/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 0/100.