Mastic Beach Conservancy Corp
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 871707321
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2023
- Location
- Mastic Beach, NY, USA
- Phone
- 6313361047
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Water Resource, Wetlands Conservation and Management
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $105,241
- Expenses
- $33,417
- Assets
- $194,129
- Liabilities
- $655
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MAURA SPERY (PRESIDENT)
- JOHNNY PANESSA (VICE PRESIDENT)
- DAVID YUN (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- MAURA SPERY (PRESIDENT)
- JOHNNY PANESSA (VICE PRESIDENT)
- DAVID YUN (VICE PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To conserve the 6 1/2 miles of publicly- accessible, recreational waterfront throughout the mastic beach and shirley conservation areas. The organization strives to improve and protect
What it reported doing in 2025
The organization created blue and green nature trails in and along the masticbeach waterfront. This encourages mobility, recreation and educationalopportunities for the community.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 71% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filed totals do not add up.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 74
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 86
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 57.8%; rating input score 58
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 68.2%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.81; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 176.5% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 39.8% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 45.4% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 57.8% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $61K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 7 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 58/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 43/100.