Master Builder Christian International University Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
923168162
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Gainesville, FL, USA
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Christianity
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$45,119
Expenses
$35,827
Assets
$33,507
Liabilities
$100

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Ronald L Bernier (President)

People named in this filing

  • Ronald L Bernier (President)
  • Charlene M Robillard (Treasurer)
  • Bernice Bernier (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Establish and operate a Christian college providing students with rigorous academic and religious instruction designed to develop the skills necessary to succeed on their chosen professions.

What it reported doing in 2025

Courses offered in 2025: DM 815 Towards a Development of Theology in Culture; DM 803 Counseling Family Life & Pastoral Leadership; DM 805 Spiritual Development of the Pastor Church & Community; DM 806 Ethics and the Church in Todays Culture; DM 807 Conflict Management and Resolution in Church Life; DM 811 Missions in the 21st Century; DM 900 Doctoral Dissertation or Majoy Project; CE 501 Church Administration; MM501 Marketplace Influence for Change; MM505 Developing Ministers in the Marketplace; FPS 101 Faith & Community Life; RS 201 Christian Apologetics I; RS 203 Christian Apologetics II; RS 401 Understanding Culture & Social Engagement I

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 96% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 51
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 20.6%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.94; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 64.2%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 49.1% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 87.2% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 46/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 28/100.