Massey Rose Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 880742189
- IRS 990-PF coverage
- 2022–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-PF 2024
- Location
- Joaquin, TX, USA
- Phone
- 9362482329
- Rating
- 53
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fund Raising and Fund Distribution
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $392,132
- Expenses
- $468,059
Source: IRS Form 990-PF. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Overview
Mission
Fund Raising and Fund Distribution
What it reported funding in 2024
The foundation reported 7 grants totaling $235,000. The stated grant purposes included the nisd education foundation connects community resources with the needs of the school district in order to support the mission? ? of nisd?. ? the foundation uses funding to enhance and complement that mission?, ? understanding that everyone in the community is responsible for creating a quality educational system?.?, our mission is to support the families of veterans and first responders of nacogdoches county, who have been killed or injured in the line of duty, by raising and distributing funds for school, training, or other unmet needs., and the mission of christ church is to worship, evangelize, serve, educate, and gather together in celebration of god's love., plus 4 other reported purposes.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. The foundation's positive operating resources came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The foundation distributed 100% of its reported charitable disbursements as grants.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and the filing identifies who received its grants. A relatively small share of spending goes to grants and assets provide a limited cushion relative to annual grants.
Rating breakdown
- Grant Deployment: NotEnoughData
- Cost Efficiency: 50
- Transparency: 100
- Compliance: 100
- Endowment Health: 29
Detailed rating inputs
Grant Deployment
- Grant deployment ratio: Limited
Cost Efficiency
- Grant expense ratio: 50.2%; rating input score 50; 54th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency
- Grant recipient disclosure: Yes; rating input score 100
Compliance
- Part VII-B activity disclosures: 19 of 19 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Property sale or exchange with a disqualified person: Pass
- Borrowing from or lending to a disqualified person: Pass
- Goods, services, or facilities involving a disqualified person: Pass
- Compensation paid to a disqualified person: Pass
- Assets transferred to a disqualified person: Pass
- Payment to a government official: Pass
- Uncorrected prior self-dealing: Pass
- Prior-year undistributed income: Pass
- Excess business holdings: Pass
- Investments that may jeopardize charitable purposes: Pass
- Uncorrected prior-year jeopardizing investments: Pass
- Attempt to influence legislation: Pass
- Attempt to influence an election: Pass
- Grants to individuals: Pass
- Grants to organizations: Pass
- Spending for a noncharitable purpose: Pass
- Funds received for a personal-benefit contract: Pass
- Premiums paid on a personal-benefit contract: Pass
- Prohibited tax-shelter transaction: Pass
- Filing consistency checks: 9; rating input score 100
Endowment Health
- Endowment-health comparison: 0.13; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Grants: 100% of grant recipient detail disclosed
- Payout: Filed payout detail
- Trustees: Filed trustees detail
- Self-dealing: 100% of reviewed questions answered “No”
- Investments: 29th percentile for endowment coverage
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Cost Efficiency: Grant expense ratio scored 50/100.
- High — Endowment Health: Endowment-health comparison scored 29/100.