Massachusetts Society for Heathcare Risk Management Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
042764297
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2013–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
North Oxford, MA, USA
Phone
6176945132
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$20,274
Expenses
$20,180
Assets
$101,520
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Mary Ryan Kusiak (Past-President)
  • Ronnie Hanson (President)
  • Ann Huben-Kearney (President-Elect)

People named in this filing

  • Mary Ryan Kusiak (Past-President)
  • Ronnie Hanson (President)
  • Ann Huben-Kearney (President-Elect)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

An Organization of professionals dedicated to improving healthcare quality and compliance with healthcare regulations while reducing the liability exposure for healthcare delivery systems, hospitals, and caregivers. A local affilate of the American Society for Healthcare Risk Managment (ASHRM) and a personal membership group of the American Hospital Association, MSHRM is a professional organization endeavoring to advance healthcare risk management, loss prevention and patient safety. MSHRM members can participate in educational offerings, professional development, networking and peer recognition. Members also have access to the members only section of the MSHRM website, allowing members to stay current on chapter happenings, employment opportunities, regulatory and other industry developments.

What it reported doing in 2025

At least annually, MSHRM presents a day-long, on-site educational and business meeting on value and experience for members. MSHRM participates in presenting the Annual NERHRM conference.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 60
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0.5%; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.03; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -5.8% per year; rating input score 0; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -0.7% per year; rating input score 0; 35th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2013 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 45/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.