Massachusetts School Based Health Alliance
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 824209668
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
- Location
- Beverly, MA, USA
- Phone
- 9783900991
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Alliance/Advocacy Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $73,461
- Expenses
- $77,951
- Assets
- $3,342
- Liabilities
- $24,809
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Allison Kilcoyne (President)
- Jordan Hampton (Vice president)
People named in this filing
- Allison Kilcoyne (President)
- Jordan Hampton (Vice president)
- Caitlin Thorn (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To promote and support the development, expansion, and sustainability of school-based health centers in Massachusetts in order to improve access to comprehensive physical, behavioral, and preventive health services for children and adolescents.
What it reported doing in 2025
During the tax year, the organization advanced its mission to strengthen school-based health services across Massachusetts by supporting workforce development, peer learning, and technical assistance for school-based health professionals. The organization administered a mentor training grant that trained six school-based health leaders in mentorship and leadership skills. These trained leaders subsequently provided mentorship and guidance to others entering or new to the field of school-based health, expanding the capacity and sustainability of the workforce. The organization also convened the field through virtual learning opportunities, including a statewide webinar highlighting best practices in school-based health care delivery. In addition, it facilitated regular virtual Zoom sessions to provide ongoing support, consultation, and peer connection for professionals working directly with youth in school settings. These activities supported improved practice, strengthened professional networks, and enhanced the quality and consistency of school-based health services for children and adolescents.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 100
- Transparency & Controls: 73
- Sustainability: 20
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 66.7%; rating input score 67; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -6.1%; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.04; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 7.42; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 1.4%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $79K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 9 current checks pass · 3 findings to review
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part I part ii net assets crosscheck did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Series balance sheet did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 33/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 9/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 1/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 12/100.