Massachusetts Rural Schools Coalition Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 842674470
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2019–2020
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2020
- Location
- Shelburne Falls, MA, USA
- Phone
- 4136250192
- Rating
- 46
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Educational Services and Schools - Other
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $8,500
- Expenses
- $6,805
- Assets
- $6,411
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Michael A Buoniconti (President/ Treasurer/ Clerk)
People named in this filing
- Michael A Buoniconti (President/ Treasurer/ Clerk)
- David B Hopson (Director)
- Richard J Martin (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
1. Develop and provide educational programs through which rural school districts can share educational opportunities across rural school district lines. 2. Engage in educational research regarding the nature and problems of rural school districts. 3. Develop and create new and innovative ways that rural school districts can share transportation, buildings, staff, etc. in order to be able to operate more efficiently and effectively.
What it reported doing in 2020
1. Prepared grant application to National Science Foundation Computer Science for All Grant. SUMMARY: The Future Ready: CS+BIO project, a medium high-school strand proposal, will bring industry professionals working at the intersection of computer science and biology, biotechnology, life science, or medicine into rural Massachusetts AP Biology and AP Computer Science Principles (CSP) classrooms to participate in educator led, workforce-infused, project-based exercises. This cross-sector research-practitioner partnership (RPP) builds upon existing relationships to include CS and education researchers, biology and CS high school practitioners in rural MA, and industry professionals. The project's goal is to build a pipeline of students in AP Biology classes (majority 63% female) to AP CSP classes (minority female 34% nationally, 18% in rural MA), connecting their interests in Biology to CS and increasing their motivation to enroll in AP CSP and pursue CS+BIO post-secondary learning. This RPP will utilize an iterative design-based implementation research (DBIR) RPP model to develop cross-disciplinary AP CSP curriculum materials to recruit, engage, and retain female students interested in biology related careers taking AP CSP. The RPP will also design and offer professional development to practitioners, bringing together AP Biology and AP CSP teachers in rural MA to raise awareness of regional CS+BIO careers, introduce real world CS+BIO applications and tools, and provide supporting CS+BIO curriculum and resources. The project will develop a digital platform that will host a searchable database of curriculum materials including a video repository of industry work-force infused problem presentations and facilitate networked communities to enable local teacher-industry matching. This platform will help to sustain future cross-sector partnerships and to scale our work nationwide. Grant award ranges from $300K-$1 million and would benefit 15,000+ secondary students in 13 rural districts. 2. Conducted biotechnology industry in the classroom in partnership with Harvard Graduate School of Education and Massachusetts Biotechnology Education Foundation. Benefitted 300+ students in 7 rural school districts. During the fall of 2020, this initiative has conducted live virtual sessions connecting secondary students to industry professionals around career pathways and project-based-learning experiences. Participation vastly exceeded the original pilot goal of 2-3 districts, 2-3 teachers and 15-20 students. Instead, participation blossomed to 7 districts, 10 teachers and approximately 330 students. The success of this pilot project has encouraged the participating organizations to begin preparing a submission of an application for a much more robust Computer Science for All grant funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF). The MRSC's unique access to rural public school districts across the Commonwealth of Massachusetts is viewed by HGSE and MassBioEd as a strategic advantage in this potential NSF application.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Membership-supported. 76% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 58
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 19.9%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.94; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 2.9% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 30.5% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2019 to 2020
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 34/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.