Mass Eye and Ear
Legal name: Massachusetts Eye and Ear Associates Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 222658209
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2017
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2017
- Location
- Boston, MA, United States
- Phone
- 617-523-7900
- Rating
- 63
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Community Health Systems
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $129,616,534
- Expenses
- $128,977,199
- Assets
- $33,300,388
- Liabilities
- $13,811,307
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
17 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- JOHN FERNANDEZ (DIRECTOR): $1,372,817 total reported compensation
- D BRADLEY WELLING (DIR, CHAIR/PRES (UNTIL 12/17)): $1,221,227 total reported compensation
- JOAN W MILLER (DIR CHAIR/PRES (AS OF 8/23/18)): $1,052,983 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Massachusetts Eye and Ear is committed to excellence in the care of disorders affecting the eye, ear, nose, throat, and adjacent regions of the head and neck, including prevention, diagnosis, and treatment, and the rehabilitation of patients with these conditions. Massachusetts Eye and Ear is a specialty hospital dedicated to excellence in the care of disorders that affect the eye, ear, nose, throat, and adjacent regions of the head and neck. Mass. Eye and Ear provides primary care and serves as a referral center for outpatient and inpatient medical and surgical care. Our Mission In conjunction with Harvard Medical School, Mass. Eye and Ear is committed to the education of future health care professionals, as well as the education of the public concerning the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of the diseases in its specialties and concerning the rehabilitation of patients...
What it reported doing in 2017
See schedule o.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 94% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and the filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 79
- Transparency & Controls: 57
- Accountability: 42
- Sustainability: 25
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 88%; rating input score 88
- Program expense ratio: 88.5%; rating input score 89
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
- Grant itemization coverage: Scored; rating input score 0
- Major donor itemization: No; rating input score 0
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0.5%; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.26; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.41; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 7.3%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.9% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.7% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.8% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 6 programs and campaigns described on the official site
- Where the money goes: 88% of revenue deployed · 88.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 3 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $114.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $1.4M · 17 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $1M reported
- Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2011 to 2017
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 13 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 18 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Major donor itemization scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 33/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 10/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 7/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 47/100.