Massachusetts Coalition for Adult Education Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
223016440
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2018–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Boston, MA, USA
Phone
6174826223
Rating
74
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$135,158
Expenses
$113,049
Assets
$258,407
Liabilities
$201

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ROBERTA SOOLMAN (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • FRED ABISI (DIRECTOR)
  • JEANNE ANNINO (DIRECTOR)
  • SUZANNE MARTIN (VICE PRES/ T)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Massachusetts coalition for adult education (mcae) champions the right of all adults to acquire 21st century literacy, english language and numeracy skills leading to economic prosperity, strong families and vibrant communities. Mcae provides leadership, professional development, communication and advocacy to advance quality adult basic education.

What it reported doing in 2024

In fy25, the organization held an in-person professional development conference with 633 registrants, making it mcae's largest conference to date, and successfully advocated for 58.9 million in state funding for adult education programming during a difficult budget year.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 97% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 98% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Liabilities are high compared with assets.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 66
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 71
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 61.4%; rating input score 61
  • Program expense ratio: 73.4%; rating input score 73

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 16.4%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.29; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 2% per year; rating input score 100; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 13% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 24.8% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 61.4% of revenue deployed · 73.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $83K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2018 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 51/100.