Massachusetts Chapter of the American College of Surgeons

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
042383339
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2018–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Beverly, MA, USA
Phone
9789278330
Rating
89
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Scholarships, Student Financial Aid Services, Awards

Reported finances

Revenue
$102,394
Expenses
$151,735
Assets
$157,838
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JACQUELINE J WU MD (PRESIDENT)
  • FAINA NAKHLIS MD (PRESIDENT-ELECT)
  • ALI TAVAKKOLI MD (PAST PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • JACQUELINE J WU MD (PRESIDENT)
  • FAINA NAKHLIS MD (PRESIDENT-ELECT)
  • NEAL E SEYMOUR MD (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To elevate the standards of surgery, establish a standard of competency and of character for practitiones of surgery, to provide a method of granting fellowship in the organization, and to educate the public and the profession to understand that the practice of surgery calls for special training and that the surgeon elected to the fellowship in this college has had such training and is properly qualified to provide surgery.

What it reported doing in 2024

Massachusetts surgical quality improvement collaborative (masqic), a quality initiative which includes nsqip champions. The primary function of the collaborative is to provide a forum for surgeons across Massachusetts to share best practices and improve the value of surgical care.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 98% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and assets have declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 87
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 35
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 98.9%; rating input score 99
  • Program expense ratio: 66.7%; rating input score 67

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -48.2%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.04; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 11.4% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3.1% per year; rating input score 100; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -4.2% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 98.9% of revenue deployed · 66.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $101K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2018 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.