Massachusetts Academy of Dermatology

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
042551359
IRS 990 coverage
2016–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Boxborough, MA, USA
Phone
9785775408
Rating confidence
Limited

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$229,631
Expenses
$384,658
Assets
$190,563
Liabilities
$1,676

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

16 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JENNIFER TOYOHARA MD FAAD (PRESIDENT)
  • GARY MENDESE MD FAAD FACMS (VICE-PRESIDENT)
  • IRA L SKOLNIK MD PHD (PAST PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • JENNIFER TOYOHARA MD FAAD (PRESIDENT)
  • GARY MENDESE MD FAAD FACMS (VICE-PRESIDENT)
  • AVERY LACHANCE MD MPH (TREASURER/SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide a forum for the interchange of information and ideas between members of the medical profession specializing in dermatology, to promote the education of dermatologists in the diagnosis, care and cure of skin diseases, and to protect the rights of patients for quality dermatologic care in the commonwealth of Massachusetts.

What it reported doing in 2025

Provided educational seminars and conferences to more than 200 practicing dermatologists in massacusetts. Provided high-quality continuing education programs focused on both clinical topics and practice management issues. The 2025 annual meeting consisted of a lineup of distinguished guest speakers, including national leaders in the field of dermatology. The speakers presented an array of topics of interest to our membership. As a result of participating in this meeting, attendees learned how to adjust to the changing health care environment, how to recognize challenges such as narrowing networks, and assess ways of dealing with reduced access to physicians and medications. Attendees increased their knowledge of new treatments and procedures associated with the practice of cosmetic dermatology with an emphasis on dermatologic issues and cite practices that improve the quality, ease, and efficiency of common procedures used in general dermatological practice.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 91% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 82
  • Sustainability: 21
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 4 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 57
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -67.5%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.5; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 6.1% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -2% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 16 of 16 board members independent · 4 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $380K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 16 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2016 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 6 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 25/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 40/100.