Masonic Homes of California

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
941156564
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
Location
San Francisco, CA, USA
Phone
4157767000
Rating
83
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Supportive Housing for Older Adults

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$75,672,556
Expenses
$99,138,032
Assets
$1,240,498,884
Liabilities
$64,535,457

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

34 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • TERRY QUIGLEY (PRESIDENT AND CEO)
  • VINCENT GONZAGA (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • CHRISTINE GERSHTEIN (VICE PRESIDENT OF CLINICAL SERVICES)

Highest reported compensation

  • TERRY QUIGLEY (PRESIDENT AND CEO): $606,177 total reported compensation
  • JOSEPH PRITCHARD (FORMER CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER): $534,382 total reported compensation
  • ALLAN L CASALOU (GRAND SECRETARY): $429,997 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

In keeping with the tenets of freemasonry, the masonic homes of California promotes the quality of life by empowering our members, their families and our communities to live well and achieve meaningful and rewarding lives. (continued on sch. O)the masonic homes of California serves seniors, youth and families for the better by providing solutions to the challenges faced by masons, their families and our surrounding communities.

What it reported doing in 2024

Masonic outreach program: masonic homes of California knows that many of our constituents prefer to live their lives in their own homes or home communities. Yet many need help coping with the challenges and issues associated with aging. In response, the masonic homes of California offers masonic outreach services (mos) program to better meet the needs of our constituents who wish to remain in their own home or community. Masonic homes' goal is to provide our fraternal family members access to the services and resources they need to stay healthy and safe in their own homes or in retirement facilities in their home communities. Masonic outreach services include, ongoing financial and care support for those with demonstrated need, interim financial and care support (continued on sch. O)for those on the wait list for the masonic homes of California, and information and referrals to community-based senior providers across California. Some clients need help identifying appropriate service providers in their area. Others need help developing a comprehensive care plan that addresses their physical, emotional and financial needs. Mos tailors its services to the needs of the client. For those clients who need financial assistance, a care plan and budget is developed that supports their physical, emotional and social wellbeing. The amount of support clients receive is determined by their needs. As needs change, so does the amount of support. Mos also provides financial and care management support to those with immediate and pressing needs who are on the waiting list for the masonic homes of California. We know waiting can be difficult when your needs are urgent.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 65% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 92% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 87
  • Transparency & Controls: 74
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 42
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 89.4%; rating input score 89
  • Fundraising efficiency: $3.81 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -31%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 12.51; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 3.7%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 5.5% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.6% per year; rating input score 100; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 2.5% per year; rating input score 100; 17th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 89.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 12 of 13 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $88.6M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $606K · 34 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $3.5M reported
  • Consistency: 36 of 36 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 13 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 7 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 15/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 29/100.