Mascode Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 831540554
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2023
- Location
- Miami Gardens, FL, USA
- Phone
- 3056848986
- Rating
- 72
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Alliance/Advocacy
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $4,000
- Expenses
- $2,086
- Assets
- $2,030
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
People named in this filing
- Korene Stuart (Co-Director)
- Shenica Henderson-Davis (Co-Director)
- Kaija Ranglin (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
MAScode Inc. is a dedicated organization with a clear mission to uplift communities by promoting participation in S.T.E.M. careers, offering tech training opportunities for both youth and adults, and assisting micro and small businesses to thrive.
What it reported doing in 2024
In 2024, MAScode advanced its mission of increasing economic mobility and tech access by expanding its digital literacy and workforce development initiatives. We participated in the Render Conference in Atlanta in June and the Prosperity Summit in October, connecting with national leaders in innovation and job quality. As a member of the Good Jobs Cohort, MAScode supported small businesses in implementing good jobs principles to strengthen operations and employee well-being. Throughout the year, we hosted webinars for both youth and adults to raise awareness of opportunities in tech and STEM careers, encouraging participation from surrounding communities. In addition, MAScode created and shared curricula for other nonprofits at no cost, helping them integrate digital literacy and technology education into their own programs and extend impact across communities
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filed totals do not add up.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 71
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 70
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 52.7%; rating input score 53
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 47.9%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.97; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 52.7% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 53/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 46/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.