Marysville Theatrical Arts Boosters
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 880871160
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2021
- Location
- Marysville, OH, USA
- Phone
- 9375942950
- Rating
- 53
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fund Raising and/or Fund Distribution
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $143,628
- Expenses
- $107,894
- Assets
- $100,950
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- TARA HENLEY (VICE PRESIDENT)
- PEGGY JACKSON (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- BRIANNA BIZZARO (DIRECTOR)
- LUKE AHERN (DIRECTOR)
- KATIE LANGHALS (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Marysville theater arts boosters was created to help marysville high school and marysville early stem high school with their theater art program. We also assist the bunsold middle school theater dept. The theater art program helps students come together to perform. These performances help students share their talents of music, acting, set design and engineering sound and lights. We help with fundraising, organize volunteers and help coordinate enrichment opportunities.
What it reported doing in 2024
The purpose of the mtab is to help students learn. Theater arts encourages students to look at the world through different perspectives, solve problems creatively, and collaborate with others. The skills learned from theater arts will help students throughout their lives. Theater also brings families together and helps support the community. Mtab is created to help the students make the most out of learning.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 29
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 61
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 46.9%; rating input score 47
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 24.9%; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.94; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 31% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 91.1% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 46.9% of revenue deployed
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 47/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 57/100.