Maryland International Harvestor Collectors Chapter 39 Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 262689231
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2015, Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
- Location
- Ijamsville, MD, USA
- Phone
- 3014180635
- Rating
- 87
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Historical Societies, Related Historical Activities
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $18,809
- Expenses
- $17,650
- Assets
- $44,591
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JONATHON SPEAK (PRESIDENT)
- GARY HAINES (VICE-PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- JONATHON SPEAK (PRESIDENT)
- GARY HAINES (VICE-PRESIDENT)
- JENNIFER SPEAK (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To promote the collecting, restoring, and demonstrating of international harvester tractors, trucks, implements, and memorabilia.
What it reported doing in 2025
Fall harvest show is held the 3rd weekend in october, it is where families can bring their kids and enjoy many activities for free, there are hay wagon rides to the pumpkin patch where you can pick your favorite pumpkin, barrel train rides, face painting and a kiddie pedal pull. There are tractors, trucks and steam engines on display for people to look at. Food is catered in so breakfast and lunch are provided. On sunday we hold a benefit cake auction, cakes and other baked goods are donated and auctioned off, the year all proceeds went the the frederick co theraputic riding center. An estimated 400 people attended.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 100
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 61
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 6.2%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.53; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -8.6% per year; rating input score 0; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.4% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $112K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 55/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.