Maryland Behavioral Health Network Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
465368399
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2015–2019
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2019
Location
Frederick, MD, USA
Phone
4104997604
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Community Mental Health Center

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$150
Expenses
$120,770
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SCOTT ROSE (PRESIDENT)
  • MIKE DRUMMOND (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • STEVE BARON (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

  • SCOTT ROSE (PRESIDENT)
  • MIKE DRUMMOND (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • DIMITRI CAVATHAS (SECRETARY/TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Develop a network of innovative behavioral health providers to improve quality of care by building the capacity to implement data-driven services and to share financial risk.

What it reported doing in 2019

Develop and implement innovative strategies to improve health outcomes and reduce medical costs for individuals with significant behavioral health needs through its network of member affiliated nonprofit behavioral health organizations.

Operating model

Revenue model
No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 31
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 2
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 30.7%; rating input score 31

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -80,413.3%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 12.5%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -21% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -39% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -18.1% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 30.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $37K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 8 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2015 to 2019
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 31/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 9/100.