Mary's Woods
Legal name: Mary's Woods at Marylhurst Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 911833480
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Lake Oswego, OR, United States
- Phone
- (503) 675-2004
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Senior Citizens' Housing/Retirement Communities
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $54,560,850
- Expenses
- $61,702,063
- Assets
- $333,986,762
- Liabilities
- $427,638,866
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
29 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KIMBERLY SCOTT (CFO & INTERIM CEO)
- TRAVIS DUNCAN (CEO (AS OF SEPTEMBER 2024))
Highest reported compensation
- KIMBERLY SCOTT (CFO & INTERIM CEO): $309,246 total reported compensation
- MARTIE MOORE CHIEF HEALTH (WELLNESS OFFICER (THROUGH JAN 2025)): $254,693 total reported compensation
- RALF BRABANDT CHIEF OPERATING (OFFICER (THROUGH JANUARY 2025)): $251,565 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Mary’s Woods is a caring community inspired by the vision and values of the Sisters of the Holy Names of Jesus and Mary, providing a continuum of housing, health and educational services. Mary’s Woods seeks to ensure the dignity, independence, well-being and security of older persons through the provision of a range of service and educational options.
What it reported doing in 2024
Mary's woods is a continuing care retirement community (also known as a life plan community) located in the portland metropolitan area that provides a continuum of housing, health and educational services to those 62 years of age and older. Services provided to its resident population include independent and supported housing, health care support, wellness programming, educational, social and cultural activities, and spiritual care. The resident population is approximately 752 individuals, with the vast majority living individually in 481 apartments and villas. As part of its continuing care commitment, mary's woods also supports two health care centers that can house approximately 160 residents in assisted living, residential care, and memory care programs. (see schedule o)during the fiscal year ended june 30, 2025, mary's woods provided 47,856 days of resident services to aging adults.mary's woods also offers services and activities to non-residents living in the surrounding community including musical concerts, talks, and art displays.background and mission: mary's woods is a continuing care retirement community (ccrc) established in 1997 and opened in 2001 as a ministry of the sisters of the holy names of jesus and mary. Mary's woods is an extension of the heritage of the sisters of the holy names of jesus and mary, which is to provide a continuum of housing, health and educational services to ensure the full development of every individual at every stage of life.mary's woods at marylhurst is a caring community inspired by the vision and values of the sisters of the holy names of jesus and mary, providing a continuum of housing, health and educational services. Mary's woods responds to the gospel's vision of full development for every individual at each life stage. Mary's woods seeks to ensure the dignity, independence, well-being and security of older persons through the provision of a range of services and educational options. An array of services enriches the physical, emotional and spiritual well-being of each resident, employee and all others affiliated with our community. Sponsored by the sisters of the holy names and rooted in catholic ethical values, mary's woods is characterized by a commitment to: an environment of beauty, a celebration of life, hospitality and compassion, reverence and integrity, a spirit of service and the exploration of the journey of aging. Mary's woods lives out its core values of respect, compassion, excellence, stewardship and justice in a spirit of service by being a welcoming, caring and generous community. As a mission-driven not-for-profit organization, mary's woods has the privilege of enhancing the lives of both those who live and work on the campus and those residing in the broader community.mary's woods expanded its fundraising services to continue to carry out the organization's mission. Mary's woods accepts charitable contributions for five funds: (1) resident assistance, (2) employee education, (3) innovation, (4) capital projects and improvements and (5) greatest need. These funds help us serve our mission. For example, the resident assistance fund helps residents who, through no fault of their own, face difficulties meeting their basic monthly costs. In these instances, the fund serves as a safety net. Knowing the resident assistance fund is there to help when needed provides the community with a profound sense of security.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 92% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 86
- Transparency & Controls: 66
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 32
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 90.2%; rating input score 90
- Fundraising efficiency: $1.11 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 0%; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -13.1%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.41; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.28; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 3.5%; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 9.9% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.5% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 11% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 90.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 18 of 18 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $55.6M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $309K · 29 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $6.1M reported
- Consistency: 36 of 37 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 11 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 3/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 6/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 3/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 31/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.