Mary Kilgour Cunningham Stephenson Le Blond Foundation Dba Bold and Brave Kids

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
475388465
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2016–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2015
Location
West Chester, OH, USA
Phone
5133606687
Rating
88
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Patient Services - Entertainment, Recreation

Reported finances

Revenue
$156,234
Expenses
$123,855
Assets
$368,207
Liabilities
$5,638

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • APRIL M MONTGOMERY (PRESIDENT, EXECUTIVE DIREC)

People named in this filing

  • MATTHEW FITZGIBBON (DIRECTOR)
  • CARTER RANDOLPH (DIRECTOR)
  • MARY BETH MORGAN (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Providing a comfortable home away from home for families who bring their children for cancer treatment at the cincinnati children's proton therapy center.

What it reported doing in 2025

Provide children and their families a place to call home by providing fully-furnished and equipped temporay appartments for families of children being treated for cancer at the cincinnati children's proton therapy center.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 97% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration and liabilities are high compared with assets.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 80
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 66
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 73%; rating input score 73
  • Program expense ratio: 91%; rating input score 91

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 20.7%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.97; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 9.7%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 29.3% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 13.7% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 21.5% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 73% of revenue deployed · 91% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $113K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2016 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 22/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 34/100.