Mary D Hock Memorial Fund B 04-3891

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
316678093
IRS 990-PF coverage
2010–2010
Forms available
Form 990-PF 2010
Location
Cincinnati, OH, USA
Phone
5136324632
Rating
20
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Financial Institutions

Reported finances

Revenue
$4,473
Expenses
$5,105

Source: IRS Form 990-PF. Selected filing: tax year 2010. Amounts in USD.

Overview

Mission

Financial Institutions

Operating model

Revenue model
Investment-supported. 100% of the foundation's positive operating resources came from recurring investment income.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The foundation distributed 78% of its reported charitable disbursements as grants.

The verdict

REVIEW - The strongest available result is that a large share of spending goes to charitable work. The filing does not identify all grant recipients and a relatively small share of spending goes to grants.

Rating breakdown

  • Grant Deployment: NotEnoughData
  • Cost Efficiency: 52
  • Transparency: 0
  • Compliance: 50
  • Endowment Health: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Grant Deployment

  • Grant deployment ratio: Limited

Cost Efficiency

  • Grant expense ratio: 51.7%; rating input score 52; 23rd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency

  • Grant recipient disclosure: Scored; rating input score 0

Compliance

  • Foundation activity disclosures: Limited
  • Filing consistency checks: 4; rating input score 100

Endowment Health

  • Endowment-health comparison: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Investments: Filed investments detail
  • Consistency: 4 of 4 current checks pass
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency: Grant recipient disclosure scored 0/100.
  • Review — Cost Efficiency: Grant expense ratio scored 52/100.