Mary Black Memorial Auxiliary
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 237336091
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2018–2022
- Forms available
- Form 990 2017, Form 990-EZ 2022
- Location
- Drayton, SC, USA
- Phone
- 8645850739
- Rating
- 33
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Hospital, General
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $43,492
- Expenses
- $294,645
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JANE MAY (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- ALICE FURBER (ASSISTANT SECRETARY)
- GERTRUDE CAMPBELL (DIRECTOR)
- JIM ERWIN (LIFELINE CHAIRMAN)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To support and improve the welfare of patients of mary black hospital, to provide assistance on a volunteer basis to the patients, to operate a gift shop and vending machines for the purpose of improving physical comfort of patients and visitorsclosed in 1st quarter 2023 and contributed all proceeds to other charities.
What it reported doing in 2022
Providing services to medical patients in the community, such as interpreters, and tours of the hospital facilities for expectant mothers some specific projects include gifts for new mothers, supplies and gifts at the mbh birthing center, gifts and books for breast cancer patients, and providing educational and entertainment items for children and others in the surgery waiting room of the hospital
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 9
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -577.5%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -2.4% per year; rating input score 0; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -13.8% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2018 to 2022
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.