MLK Community Healthcare

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
274658935
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Los Angeles, CA, USA
Phone
(424) 338-8000
Rating
86
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Hospital, General

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$461,003,899
Expenses
$447,026,053
Assets
$618,908,058
Liabilities
$538,617,694

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

30 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ELAINE BATCHLOR (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)

Highest reported compensation

  • ELAINE BATCHLOR (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $1,291,417 total reported compensation
  • JOHN FISHER (CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER): $696,550 total reported compensation
  • KURT STAUDER PRESIDENT (OF MEDICAL GROUP (THRU 06/25)): $555,751 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To reinvent care delivery in safety-net communities and provide compassionate, collaborative, quality care that improves the health of the community. When we opened in 2015, we recognized we had a unique opportunity: to reinvent the way care is delivered in safety-net communities. Our goal is to provide care equal to that found in more affluent areas and that commitment is reflected in everything we do. From our beautiful, state-of-the-art facilities to our best-in-class technology, systems and operations, to our mission-driven providers from the nation’s leading academic centers, we have established an intentional, quality-driven healthcare culture to address South LA’s most pressing health problems. Read more about our **quality**. badges_2026 "MLKCH is a state-of-the-art oasis of care in a healthcare desert" - CNN.

What it reported doing in 2024

Martin luther king, jr. Community hospital (mlkch) is a completely new facility replacing a prior county facility that was closed due to quality of care issues in 2007. Mlkch is a unique private-public partnership. As a private, non-profit freestanding 501(c)(3) corporation, mlkch leases a completely new $280 million hospital facility from the county of los angeles. Mlkch was licensed by the California department of public health on april 28, 2015 and opened to patient care on may 14, 2015. After initial licensing, mlkch passed through the following milestones as it became fully operational:- accredited by the joint commission on june 30, 2015- opened its emergency department on july 7, 2015- began accepting rescue ambulances on august 11, 2015- staged a phased opening of its inpatient facilities so that all inpatient beds were opened and staffed by december 2015. Since then, hospital has credentialed almost 400 physicians and hired over 2,000 employees and contractors to meet the expected volume of patients. Mlkch's service area is one of the poorest in metropolitan los angeles and suffers from a severe shortage of physicians. As a result, emergency department volume has consistently exceeded projections.in january 2020, the hospital, through working with a developer and the county of los angeles, completed the construction of a 50,000 sq. Ft. Medical office building, a two story building adjacent to the hospital. The hospital will be expanding outpatient services to include wound care and other services. In the fiscal year ended june 30, 2025, mlkch served its community by providing 9,551 acute inpatient admissions, 51,105 acute inpatient days, 601 deliveries, 2,062 inpatient surgeries, 428 outpatient surgeries, 124,457 outpatient and inpatient emergency visits, and 6,469 outpatient observation visits.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 87% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 98% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 82
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 94
  • Sustainability: 46
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 91.1%; rating input score 91
  • Program expense ratio: 93.8%; rating input score 94
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 90%; rating input score 90; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 3%; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.38; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.87; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 2%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 12.9% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 14.6% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 10% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 91.1% of revenue deployed · 93.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 9 of 10 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $419.1M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $1.3M · 30 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $74.3M reported
  • Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 24 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 6 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 48/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 51/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 14/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.