Martin High School Orchestra Parent Booster Club Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN: 752341042
IRS 990-EZ coverage: 2017–2024
Forms available: Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2016
Location: Arlington, TX, USA
Phone: 2147938515
Rating: 86
Verdict: STRONG
Rating confidence: Moderate
Sector: Single Organization Support

Reported finances

Revenue: $41,735
Expenses: $44,691
Assets: $20,975

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

KIM SHAW (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

KIM SHAW (PRESIDENT)
STACEY MCGUINNEY (VP FUNDRAISI)
DONNA WINCHESTER (VP MEMBERSHI)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The purpose of the martin high school orchestra booster club is to assist the orchestra director in carrying out the activities of the orchestra and to give aid in areas that might require assistance toward realizing the objectives of the orchestra program. The purpose is also to promote interest and support of the orchestra, improve parents understanding of the students' obligations within the orchestra organization, and to improve the school spirit through attendance at orchestra functions.

Operating model

Revenue model: Other-operating. 70% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model: Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

Financial Efficiency: 99
Transparency & Controls: 82
Sustainability: 31
Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
Program expense ratio: 97.1%; rating input score 97

Transparency & Controls

Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

Operating margin: -7.1%; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.47; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

Program expense growth: 1.5% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
Revenue growth: -2.8% per year; rating input score 0; 41st percentile among comparable filings
Asset growth: -6.9% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings

Details

Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 97.1% of spending went to programs
Governance: Filed governance answers
Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $43K in reported program spending
Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
Schedules: 3 filed schedules
Filing history: 7 filing years from 2017 to 2024
Contacts: How to reach this organization
Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 34/100.
High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 28/100.
High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.