Martha T Berry Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
460713579
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Mt Clemens, MI, USA
Phone
5867380188
Rating
94
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Centers to Support the Independence of Specific Populations

Reported finances

Revenue
$88,864
Expenses
$200,455
Assets
$165,658
Liabilities
$220

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

15 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Mr Kevin Evans (Executive Director)

People named in this filing

  • Ms Karen Bathanti (Board Chair)
  • Ms Kim Nicholson (Vice Chair)
  • Ms Natalie Boivin (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Martha T. Berry Foundation is organized and operated exclusively for charitable, educational, and scientific purposes within the meaning of Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. Founded to support the Martha T. Berry Medical Care Facility, a comprehensive long-term care facility owned and operated by Macomb County, Michigan, the Foundation advances the health, welfare, and quality of life of the facility's residents. Since its establishment by Macomb County, the Martha T. Berry Medical Care Facility has served as a safety net for frail elderly individuals with limited or no financial means to obtain necessary care and services. The Foundation raises and administers charitable contributions to provide enhanced resident programs, activities, comfort measures, equipment, amenities, and community support beyond those funded through normal operating resources. The Foundation conducts all activities incidental and necessary to further these charitable purposes.

What it reported doing in 2025

Provided funding for the purchase of a resident transportation bus to support resident activities, medical transportation, and quality of life.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 96
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 26
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 89.7%; rating input score 90

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -125.6%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.83; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 77.6% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 16.9% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 7% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 89.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $180K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 15 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 6/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 43/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 30/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.