Martha's Kitchen
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 912091094
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- San Jose, CA, USA
- Phone
- 4082936111
- Rating
- 87
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $6,749,866
- Expenses
- $6,668,113
- Assets
- $11,293,715
- Liabilities
- $218,131
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
16 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- RAY DAVILLA (PRESIDENT)
- RAY FLOWERS (IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT)
- WILLIAM LEE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- WILLIAM LEE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $271,351 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Martha's kitchen recycles perishable food donated by restaurants, grocery stores, food banks, and other sources for the purpose of providing hot, nourishing meals and food to needy persons. Food is provided at the organization's facilities as well as foodstuffs given to families in home settings. Finally, other organizations are supported by receiving prepared food directly from martha's kitchen for use in their individual facilities.
What it reported doing in 2024
Martha's kitchen (the organization") is a nonprofit public benefit corporation whose mission is to provide hot meals and support to people in need in santa clara county, California, and surrounding areas. The organization began in the 1960s when founder louise benson gave out peanut butter sandwiches and other essentials to the people in need from her garage in the willow glen area of san jose, California. When neighbors complained about the lines of poor people in the neighborhood, she moved her ministry to her home parish in 1981. A few years later, the organization was absorbed by catholic charities until 2001 when it was incorporated as an independent nonprofit organization.the organization leases kitchen and dining room facilities at 311 willow street, san jose, California from the catholic diocese of san jose. During the year ended june 30, 2025 - 792,549 meals and 1,451,417 pounds of groceries were either served at the facility or distributed to other food service facilities.the organization provides meals and support to people in need in the following counties for year ended june 30, 2025:-santa clara-santa cruz-san benito-san mateo-fresno the organization measures success by counting the number of meals prepared and the number of serving sites. In the past few years, the organization has more than tripled the number of meals it prepares from less than 250,000 to over 1,206,000 a year; and nearly doubled the number of partners-serving sites from 30 to 57 as of year ended june 30, 2025. When the covid-19 pandemic hit, the organization nearly doubled the number of hot meals being served. The amount of groceries distributed has also increased dramatically since the onset of covid-19 and the organization distributed more than 1.5 million pounds of groceries in the past year.the organization is a community-driven organization. This nonprofit food provider received 18503 hours of volunteer time valued at $742,710 during the year ended june 30, 2024 to help with its mission of feeding the hungry. The value of volunteer time is based on the estimated hourly value of volunteer time in the state of California as determined by independent sector (independentsector.org). The local food bank and grocery stores as well as large venues donated food, property and equipment, rent and supplies which totaled $3,431,159 during the year ended june 30, 2025.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 87% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 40% for direct work, and 60% for grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 92
- Transparency & Controls: 76
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 51
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 88.7%; rating input score 89
- Fundraising efficiency: $23.32 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 94.1%; rating input score 94; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 98%; rating input score 98; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 1.2%; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.69; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4.1%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 16.9% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 16.2% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.9% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 88.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $5.9M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $271K · 16 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 34 of 35 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2014 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 42 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 41 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 38/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 56/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.