Martha Lloyd Community Residential Facility Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 251459614
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Troy, PA, USA
- Phone
- 5702972185
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Residential Care & Adult Day Programs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $16,191,879
- Expenses
- $15,265,864
- Assets
- $10,039,227
- Liabilities
- $1,303,562
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DR JANILYN ELIAS (PRESIDENT/CEO - BEGINNING JANUARY 2025)
- LISA MUSSELMAN (CEO - THROUGH AUGUST 2024)
- CAROLYN ROBINSON (CRF EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- GRETCHEN H MCCLURE (CRF EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR - THROUGH SEPTEMBER 2024)
- DOUG ULKINS (DIRECTOR PART YEAR - CEO PART YEAR)
Highest reported compensation
- LISA MUSSELMAN (CEO - THROUGH AUGUST 2024): $164,926 total reported compensation
- MICHELE DEEGHAN (CFO - THROUGH JULY 2025): $126,379 total reported compensation
- GRETCHEN H MCCLURE (CRF EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR - THROUGH SEPTEMBER 2024): $116,479 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To offer individualized opportunities and support to maximize the quality of life for people with developmental disabilities.
What it reported doing in 2024
Providing living arrangements in the community for persons with disabilities who are not capable of living independently. The age of the person is not restricted. Many elderly persons live in the residential settings, some in specially designed housing that allows them to stay until end of life. Persons under age 15 are not encouraged to move into residential arrangements if they have viable families. This program includes providing services to elderly persons, both non-handicapped and handicapped.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 98% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 97% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 79
- Transparency & Controls: 70
- Accountability: 85
- Sustainability: 51
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 86%; rating input score 86
- Program expense ratio: 92.7%; rating input score 93
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 75%; rating input score 75; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 5.7%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.66; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.13; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 1.8%; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 6.3% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.5% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 17.3% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 86% of revenue deployed · 92.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 8 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $14.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $165K · 13 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2014 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 23/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 56/100.