Martha & Mary
Legal name: Martha and Mary Lutheran Services
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 910567265
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Poulsbo, WA, United States
- Phone
- 360.779.7500
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Supportive Housing for Older Adults
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,965,664
- Expenses
- $3,073,398
- Assets
- $6,132,344
- Liabilities
- $292,963
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
18 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LYNETTE LADENBURG (CEO)
- BILL CRABTREE (PRESIDENT & TRUSTEE)
- LYNN NORDBY (VICE PRESIDENT & PRESIDENT)
- DIANA SMELAND (TRUSTEE & VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- LYNETTE LADENBURG (CEO): $233,179 total reported compensation
- CHRISTOPHER VERNON-COLE (COO): $157,138 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
At Martha & Mary Martha & Mary provides quality, compassionate care and intergenerational experiences for children, adults, and seniors regardless of faith, ethnicity, or economic status. We do this in a Christian manner by offering those we serve caring rehabilitation, a safe place to grow and learn, and an opportunity to live with dignity, honor and individuality. Our member congregations Throughout our history, Lutheran churches in Kitsap County and beyond have supported our mission of caring. We are endlessly grateful our member congregations. Bethany Lutheran Church, Bainbridge Island.
What it reported doing in 2025
See schedule othe executive management, fundraising and administrative functions provided by martha and mary lutheran services to its subsidiary organizations is critical to the success of the operation of their programs, to the individuals martha and mary organizations serve, and to the greater community. The provision of these functions allows the subsidiary organizations the freedom to focus their resources on the success of their individual missions while at the same time ensuring that these efforts are coordinated to maximize the impact on their constituents and the community.as a consolidated company (all subsidiaries combined), martha and mary is currently one of the largest private employers in the kitsap region; during the past year we employed over 570 people and served approximately 1,130 local citizens. In total, we offer a wide array of programs for children, families, and seniors. These programs are distinguished because of the size of our programs, because of the quality of our programs, and because our programs are offered not just to those with financial means, but also those whose financial situation may have otherwise excluded them from utilizing services essential to their well-being.effective executive management, fundraising and administrative support has helped our programs achieve the following:- we are the largest childcare program in the county associated with long-term care. Bridging generations and enriching lives is part of our local brand. We have received national acclaim for our unique inter-generational programs where we bring children and seniors together in a meaningful and at times inspiring way.- we recognize the importance of work/life balance for our employees. We offer a 40% discount for on-site childcare programs to those employed with martha and mary.- within martha and mary's family of services, we estimate approximately $1.383 million of under-funded care has been provided to those we serve. This makes martha and mary continually stand out as a leader, not only in the region, but also in the state of Washington because of our commitment to ensuring low income seniors and children continue to have significant access to our quality programs. We provide opportunities for educational assistance for entry-level workers to increase their skills and become assistants.- we have a proven track record of adapting to changing needs and being able to partner with other agencies in the community to ensure success for our clients, their families and the greater community. Efforts from many lutheran services stakeholders, including our executive management, fundraising, events planning and grant writing staff have helped martha and mary achieve many significant milestones in our existing operations. However, the real fruit of our effort today is in preparing for future community needs. We are engaged in planning and community coordination efforts to define and offer programs that will be necessary to meet the needs of tomorrow.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 90% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 72
- Transparency & Controls: 88
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 68
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 66.9%; rating input score 67
- Program expense ratio: 87.4%; rating input score 87
- Fundraising efficiency: $14.49 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 99.2%; rating input score 99; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 22.5%; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0.8%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.9% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.1% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.2% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 5 programs and campaigns described on the official site
- Where the money goes: 66.9% of revenue deployed · 87.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2.7M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $233K · 18 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 34 of 34 current checks pass
- Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 6 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 49/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 57/100.