Marshfield High School Athletic Boosters Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
043054733
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2009, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2023
Location
Marshfield, MA, USA
Phone
7818371945
Rating
69
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Secondary, High School

Reported finances

Revenue
$53,951
Expenses
$22,643
Assets
$82,154
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Lauren Dargan (President)
  • Jill O'Brien (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Lauren Dargan (President)
  • Jill O'Brien (Vice President)
  • Elizabeth Stevens (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Marshfield High School Athletic Boosters primary exempt purpose is to raise and distribute funds in support of all Marshfield High School Athletic Teams and Athletes.

What it reported doing in 2024

The Marshfield Athletic Booster Club works to fundraise and distribute funds to all student athletes and athletic programs within the High School. The benefactors are student athletes, and athletic teams. Funds go to support student athletes with scholarships for graduating seniors, support athletic varsity letterman jacket obtainment, develop student leaders with a leadership training academy for captains. Each year we also aim to fund nominal expenses as requested by teams or coaches that the school athletic department can not otherwise fund. Examples of items are: pinnies for practice, equipment bags, other equipment. We gave out 21 scholarships last year at $500 each, funded 100% cost for 192 letterman jackets which are about $180 per jacket, and supported 28 teams with captain leadership training which involves sponsoring leadership speaker, monthly classroom support. Program service expenses include: fe

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 100% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 54% for direct work, and 46% for grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 64
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 81
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 42%; rating input score 42
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 58%; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.63; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -2.8% per year; rating input score 0; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -3.9% per year; rating input score 0; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -0.9% per year; rating input score 0; 35th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 42% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $23K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2020 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 42/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.