Marrow Mates Incorporated

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
825199409
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2019–2020
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2020, Form 990-N 2018
Location
Tierra Verde, FL, USA
Phone
3146062125
Rating
71
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Cancer

Reported finances

Revenue
$140,317
Expenses
$48,920
Assets
$188,912

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

2 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JEFFREY HAERTLING (President)

People named in this filing

  • JEFFREY HAERTLING (President)
  • SUSAN HAERTLING (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Sharing firsthand experiences from donors who have given and survivors who have received a second chance at life from a Stem Cell Transplant. Offering recruitment support for searching patients, and mentorship from experienced survivors to transplant recipients and their caregivers.

What it reported doing in 2020

Marrow/Stem Cell Transplants are a CURE for over 85 different blood cancers and disorders including Leukemia, Lymphoma, Aplastic Anemia, Sickle Cell Disease and Thalassemia. Worldwide a patient is diagnosed with a blood cancer/disorder every 3 minutes.Offering hope and providing support to those in need. Helping ease the transition from hospital to home. Supporting patients and their caregivers as they work towards long term survivorship.Marrowmates helps connect patients and caregivers going through the bone marrow transplant process with mentors who've traveled a similar journey.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and the available information about grant readiness automatic revocation leaves an important question unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 48
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 79
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 27.7%; rating input score 28
  • Program expense ratio: 79.6%; rating input score 80

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 65.1%; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.86; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 33.3% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 63.8% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 27.7% of revenue deployed · 79.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $39K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2019 to 2020
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 28/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.