Marquette Alger Reconciliation Service Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
383396440
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Marquette, MI, USA
Phone
9062268600
Rating
96
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Reported finances

Revenue
$94,336
Expenses
$117,718
Assets
$37,823
Liabilities
$2,141

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

14 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • HON MICHAEL ANDEREGG (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • RICK SANVILLE (PRESIDENT)
  • JAN WISNIEWSKI (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

  • HEATHER ADDISON (FUND DEVELOPMENT CHAIR)
  • LESLEY ADDISON (TREASURER)
  • HON MICHAEL ANDEREGG (VICE PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Mediation services to resolve conflict

What it reported doing in 2025

Community mediation and conciliation programs provide structured, voluntary processes for resolving disputes, guided by trained mediators through dialogue, collaborative problem-solving, and workshops focused on practical skills.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 80% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 18
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -24.8%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.32; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.06; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 49.1%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 4.7% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5.3% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 10.3% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $118K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 14 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 19/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 24/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 18/100.