Mark Twain Medical Center Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 680023507
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- San Andreas, CA, USA
- Phone
- 2097542624
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Hospital, General
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,301,972
- Expenses
- $2,433,036
- Assets
- $7,679,386
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- Charanjit Singh (CPO): $225,211 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The purpose of Mark Twain Foundation is to develop resources, funding, and community support for the benefit of the Mark Twain Medical Center; to engage in and conduct charitable activities; and to promote or carry on such activities as may be deemed advisable for the betterment of the general health of the community served.
What it reported doing in 2024
The Foundation's purpose is to provide community outreach in order to obtain public support for the Medical Center. Various contributions are made to the Medical Center to help support care.In 2007, the Foundation began the transition from an event oriented fundraising organization to one which is donor oriented. Late in the year, it kicked off a campaign to raise over one million dollars toward the purchase of two digital mammography machines for the benefit of women's health.In September 2012, the Foundation engaged Neztel Grisby and Associates, a professional fundraising organization, to help coordinate a capital campaign to build a State of the Art Medical Center in Angels Camp, CA. The campaign has a goal of $2.3 million; the contract expires September 2014. The capital campaign was completed during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016.The Foundation continues to support the Mark Twain Medical Center by raising funds for various building projects, patient assistance funds, the cancer center, telehealth, imaging technology, spiritual care, pharmacy fund, and women's health.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 88
- Transparency & Controls: 79
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 34
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 97.4%; rating input score 97
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -86.9%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.16; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: Limited
Growth
- Program expense growth: 14.1% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 10.5% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 16.7% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 97.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2.4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $225K · 12 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 21 of 21 current checks pass
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Whistleblower policy not reported.