Mark Allen Manor Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 942785374
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023
- Location
- Phoenix, AZ, USA
- Phone
- 6029733727
- Rating
- 62
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Psychiatric Hospitals
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,018,198
- Expenses
- $1,076,663
- Assets
- $392,494
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CHERYL STOKES (PRES/CEO/SCRTRY)
Highest reported compensation
- CHERYL STOKES (PRES/CEO/SCRTRY): $98,800 total reported compensation
- KENDRA LAMBERTI (OFFICER): $50,193 total reported compensation
- KYLE LEONE (TREASURER): $32,805 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
In-patient health care-support & assistance in aid for care & rehabilitation of physically & mentally ill persons
What it reported doing in 2023
Year round in-patient health care-support & assistance in aid for care & rehabilitation of physically & mentally ill persons: 14 full time & 9 part time employees cared for approximately 13 patients during the fiscal year ended july 31, 2024.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 100% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 72
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Accountability: 9
- Sustainability: 29
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 82.7%; rating input score 83
- Program expense ratio: 78.2%; rating input score 78
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 22
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -5.7%; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.36; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 17.7%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 11.3% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 9.5% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 82.7% of revenue deployed · 78.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 4 board members independent · 2 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $842K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $99K · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 41 of 42 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 24/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 16/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 17/100.