Marist University

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
141442493
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
Location
Poughkeepsie, NY, USA
Phone
8455753000
Rating
85
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
University or Technological Institute

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$397,387,941
Expenses
$364,955,314
Assets
$1,122,829,591
Liabilities
$251,785,467

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

52 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KEVIN WEINMAN (PRESIDENT)
  • DENNIS J MURRAY - PROFESSOR OF (PUBLIC AFFAIRS/FORMER PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • KEVIN WEINMAN (PRESIDENT): $1,388,761 total reported compensation
  • GEOFFREY L BRACKETT (EXEC. VP FOR OPS & COMM. RELATIONS): $542,055 total reported compensation
  • JOHN DUNNE (HEAD COACH, MEN'S BASKETBALL): $453,680 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Marist University is dedicated to helping students develop the intellect, character and skills required for enlightened, ethical, and productive lives in the global community of the 21st century. Marist University is committed to maintaining a well-organized and accessible framework of policies that guide our operations, uphold our institutional values, and ensure compliance with applicable laws and regulations. This page provides centralized access to the University's official policies. Each policy has been developed through appropriate review processes and approved by designated University authorities to ensure consistency, clarity, and alignment with our mission. Commitment to Compliance All members of the Marist community—students, faculty, and staff—are expected to know and comply with applicable University policies. These policies support our shared commitment to maintaining an.

What it reported doing in 2024

Marist is a residential campus with approximately 70%+ of students living in on-campus housing all four years. The university recognizes that a student's development should be supported by their living environment and incorporates programming, peer and staff support, and other community-building activities in the residence halls. Another large auxiliary function includes foods service through both a resident and retail dining program. The resident dining operation provides food on a daily basis to over 3,000 participants through more than 10 different dining locations across campus. (continued in schedule o)the campus dining experience is focused on culinary expertise, fresh local and regional ingredients, healthy options, and a shared sense of environmental and social responsibility. Other campus auxiliary services include a campus store, computer store, and a campus/community debit card account known as marist money. Throughout all of the university's auxiliary services, an emphasis is placed on promoting sustainable practices where applicable and include, but are not limited to, educating faculty, staff, and students about the impact of their actions on the environment; identifying, establishing, and publicizing sustainability principles, goals, and best practices; providing a framework for guiding sustainable procedures, programs, and initiatives; and monitoring and reporting progress on campus sustainability initiatives. Form 990, part v, line 1a: amount reported in box 3 of form 1096marist university is reporting the number from form 1096, box 3, less the amount of forms 1098-t provided to students during the year. For 2024, there were 7,530 forms 1098-t issued.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 92% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 64% for direct work, and 36% for grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 82
  • Transparency & Controls: 78
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 69
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 89%; rating input score 89
  • Program expense ratio: 90.6%; rating input score 91
  • Fundraising efficiency: $4.12 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 95.2%; rating input score 95; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 8.2%; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.08; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.22; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 1.9%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 4.7% per year; rating input score 100; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 4.3% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 6.4% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 8 programs and campaigns described on the official site
  • Where the money goes: 89% of revenue deployed · 90.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 33 of 33 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $330.6M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $1.4M · 52 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $45.2M reported
  • Consistency: 46 of 47 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 13 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 17 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 5 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 16/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 58/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.