Marillac St Vincent Family Services Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
362109717
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Chicago, IL, USA
Phone
7737227440
Rating
83
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Reported finances

Revenue
$17,661,155
Expenses
$19,798,971
Assets
$17,916,716
Liabilities
$7,668,479

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

34 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MICHAEL CHITWOOD (CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • MICHAEL CHITWOOD (CEO): $263,571 total reported compensation
  • ANGELA MASON (CHIEF HR OFFICER): $202,515 total reported compensation
  • MAUREEN HALLAGAN (EVP OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS): $194,703 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Marillac st. Vincent family services strengthens, empowers and gives voice to those in need - in the vincentian spirit of service - through education and comprehensive programs to build vibrant communities in chicago. We fulfill our mission through quality child care and early childhood education, after-school programs, comprehensive services to isolated seniors, and outreach to individuals and families at-risk or in crisis.

What it reported doing in 2024

Msvfs youth services supports over 500 children, teens and young adults through school age, hope jr. And project hope programs. - the school age program includes before/after school services and full day summer camp for at risk children from primarily low-income households. The program is located on the north and west sides of chicago and provides enrichment activities and opportunities to increase self-esteem in 5-12 year-old children. The children and families participate in academic, and stem activities, and social, emotional and physical health opportunities. Family support services are available including individual, group and family counseling. - the hope junior program includes out-of-school services and full day summer camp for children living in poverty 5-13 years old and teens 13-20 years old. Programming focuses on social & emotional development, academics, stem, tutoring, mentoring, mental and physical health, recreation and fine arts. Teens and young adults participate in employment as youth counselors to the younger children while receiving coaching and supervision in leadership development. - project hope is a nationally recognized teen and young adult parent support program that provides services using the research-based "parents as teachers" curriculum. Services include intensive home visiting, prenatal care, doula care, counseling, prenatal and parenting groups, father and grandparent programs, leadership development, goal setting and referrals. The program serves pregnant/parenting teens, along with their children, the fathers and extended family members.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 83
  • Transparency & Controls: 81
  • Accountability: 97
  • Sustainability: 20
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 94.4%; rating input score 94
  • Program expense ratio: 84%; rating input score 84
  • Fundraising efficiency: $5.79 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 94.4%; rating input score 94; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 95.2%; rating input score 95; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -12.1%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.9; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.43; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 10.3%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 7.4% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 6.4% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 10.2% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 94.4% of revenue deployed · 84% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 20 of 21 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $16.6M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $264K · 34 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $2.4M reported
  • Consistency: 36 of 37 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 12 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 24/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 8/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 33/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 19/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 34/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.