Marianna Historic Trust
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 710838078
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Marianna, AR, USA
- Phone
- 8702952821
- Rating
- 65
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Arts, Cultural Organizations - Multipurpose
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $589,304
- Expenses
- $54,634
- Assets
- $1,732,277
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- STEVE HIGGINBOTHOM (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- NANCY APPLE (SECRETARY-TR)
- STEVE HIGGINBOTHOM (PRESIDENT)
- REBECCA HOGAN (VICE PRESIDE)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
(a) to work to save endangered historic buildings in downtown marianna, ar (b) to work toward the designation of an historic area of downtown marianna, ar as an historic district on the national register; (c) to preserve the historic and architectural character of marianna, ar through acquisition and restoration of historically or architecturally significant properties; (d) to educate the public about the history of marianna and about its architectural heritage.
What it reported doing in 2024
The trust currently owns six buildings in downtown marianna, four of which are national register properties. Five of the buildings have been completely restored and were occupied by retail businesses. The renovations have not only restored historic properties, but have also positively affected the economic revitalization of our downtown historic district by creating jobs and traffic in downtown marianna. Expenditures during the year were those necessary to insure and maintain these buildings, including depreciation. Previously, the trust also issued a challenge to the community for donations to set up an endowment fund for the maintenance of the community house, which is a national register property owned by the city of marianna. The city lacks the funds to properly maintain this historic property, which is used by the entire community as a meeting/party facility. The fund has reached an endowment level of 12,000, with 7,000 coming from the public and 5,000 coming from a matching contribution from the marianna historic trust.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 97% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 39
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 64
- Sustainability: 96
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 10.8%; rating input score 11
- Program expense ratio: 98.3%; rating input score 98
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 90.7%; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 31.71; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.3% per year; rating input score 100; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 37% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.5% per year; rating input score 100; 28th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 10.8% of revenue deployed · 98.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $54K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 14 of 15 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2013 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 11/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.