Marian Community Hospital

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
240711230
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2011
Forms available
Form 990 2011
Location
Carbondale, PA, USA
Phone
5702811000
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Hospital, General
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$27,415,996
Expenses
$39,885,691
Assets
$16,839,991
Liabilities
$51,328,838

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2011. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2011. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Marian Community Hospital is a compassionate community of women and men committed to being a transforming, healing presence by providing quality care to those we serve. Inspired by our mission and guided by our core values, Marian Community Hospital will achieve excellence in all we do and empower individuals in our community to realize an optimal quality of life. In tradition of the healing ministry of the Catholic Church and service to the community, Marian Community Hospital is totally patient focused - concentrating on patient needs and patient satisfaction.

What it reported doing in 2011

Marian Community Hospital is sponsored by the Sisters, Servants of the Immaculate Heart of Mary. The Board of Directors, Medical Staff, and employees are committed to providing quality health care and programs which contribute to the well being of the people in the communities which are served. Marian Community Hospital is operated as an acute care Hospital, which provides inpatient, outpatient, and emergency care services for residents in the service area. Marian Community Hospital offers a Charity Care Program in which medically necessary services will be made available without charge or at a reduced rate to eligible persons who cannot afford to pay for all or a part of their care.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 96% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 47
  • Accountability: 74
  • Sustainability: 14
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Scored; rating input score 0
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Scored; rating input score 0

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 71.4%; rating input score 71; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -45.5%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.42; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 3.05; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 2.1%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -6.3% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 0.4% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 5 of 7 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $32.6M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $395K · 10 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed
  • Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes grants, executive pay, and related organizations
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2010 to 2011
  • Related organizations: 194 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Related-party transparency scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 18/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 1/100.