Maria Ss Dell-assunta Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 112507361
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2013–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Westbury, NY, USA
- Phone
- 5165217342
- Rating
- 71
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Christianity
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $70,643
- Expenses
- $70,946
- Assets
- $390,687
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- GLEN ULLO (1ST VICE PRESIDENT)
- CHRISTINA PARIETTI (2ND VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- PHILIP BRADY (DIRECTOR)
- ANTONIO RAZZANO (DIRECTOR)
- JEN BOWMAN (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To strengthen and affirm faith toward the holy roman catholic church and to promote and maintain italian religious and cultural traditions exclusively through religious, charitable and educational activities.
What it reported doing in 2024
Feast of the assumption this cherished annual celebration honors both our italian cultural heritage and our deep-rooted catholic faith. Each year, the event draws hundreds of visitors from near and far to join in a day filled with tradition, food, and fellowship. Proceeds raised during the festivities support numerous local organizations and charitable causes, reinforcing our commitment to giving back to the community that sustains us.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 82% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 69
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 60
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 75%; rating input score 75
- Program expense ratio: 58.5%; rating input score 59
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -0.4%; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.51; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -3.3% per year; rating input score 0; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -0.9% per year; rating input score 0; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 1.4% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 75% of revenue deployed · 58.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $42K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2013 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 59/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 43/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.