Polska Szkoła Im. Marii Skłodowskiej-Curie
Legal name: Maria Sklodowska - Curie Polish School District 1 Pwa of A
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 364472566
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2014
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2014, Form 990-N 2014
- Location
- Niles, IL, USA
- Phone
- (847) 730-4848
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Cultural, Ethnic Awareness
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $97,653
- Expenses
- $108,952
- Assets
- $31,260
- Liabilities
- $6,205
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SYLWIA WOJTOWICZ (President)
- ZOFIA TRZECIAK (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- SYLWIA WOJTOWICZ (President)
- AGNIESZKA TRZUPEK (Director)
- JOLANTA BIELAWIEC (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our Polish School is “fun” and aims to convey the joy of being bilingual and bicultural by combining learning with fun. It provides a friendly atmosphere and prepares teachers for bilingual students and for the needs that arise from teaching Polish as a foreign language, while also teaching respect for Polish traditions, heritage, family, and culture.
What it reported doing in 2014
The organization has a school which teaches children the polish language and culture. Classes are held on satruday mornings with approximately 100 children.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 28
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -11.6%; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.29; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.2; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 0.5% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -11.5% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2010 to 2014
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 27/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 20/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 19/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.