Marcus Clay Target Booster Club Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
814123456
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2018–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2017
Location
Flower Mound, TX, USA
Phone
4697209655
Rating
88
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Single Organization Support

Reported finances

Revenue
$147,959
Expenses
$148,460
Assets
$76,256

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

2 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • BRANDY SIMMONS (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • BRANDY SIMMONS (PRESIDENT)
  • SARAH HREBEK (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Marcus clay target booster club inc. Is a non-profit corporation organized on november 22, 2016 under the laws of the state of Texas and was determine exempt under section 501(c)(3). The booster club was organized to help the youth attending marcus high school and surrounding schools, become involved in organized clay target shooting events. Clay target sports are one of the very few hobbies that people can enjoy for a lifetime. The booster clubs goal is to introduce high school and middle school students to clay target sports and expose them to the amazing culture within the sport. Their coaching models follow the top coaches in the country, each of which has been champions many times over in their respective sports. The booster club makes character development a paramount objective and seeks to dispel common misconceptions regarding the safe handling of firearms.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 97
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 34
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 96.7%; rating input score 97
  • Program expense ratio: 96.4%; rating input score 96

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -0.3%; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.51; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 16.3% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 15.2% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 19.9% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 96.7% of revenue deployed · 96.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $143K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2018 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 32/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 38/100.