March for Moms Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 814352543
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2018
- Location
- Lenexa, KS, USA
- Phone
- 8607101437
- Rating
- 88
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Public Health Program (Includes General Health and Wellness Promotion Services)
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $161,775
- Expenses
- $302,980
- Assets
- $28,263
- Liabilities
- $5,889
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LANECEYA RUSS (FORMER EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- LASTASCIA COLEMAN (PRESIDENT)
- NEEL SHAH (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- LANECEYA RUSS (FORMER EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- GINGER BREEDLOVE (DIRECTOR)
- CHANEL PORCHIA-ALBERT (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The march for moms association (the organization) helps to align and coordinate the efforts of families, healthcare providers, policymakers and other partners who are acting to achieve the best possible health and well-being of all mothers.
What it reported doing in 2024
March for moms primary goal are to highlight solutions that will end maternal mortality, improve access to high quality and equitable care, and broaden support for the challenges of early parenting.historically, march for moms convened, in partnership with industry leaders and professional associations, in Washington, dc. March for moms was able to reach hundreds of american families, advocates, and community birth workers, with messages from parents & thought leaders. March for moms continues to advocate for state & federal reforms including: extending medicaid coverage to one year post-partum for all pregnant women; medicaid coverage for doula services; workplace protections for pregnant and breastfeeding people; and improved data, transparency and quality improvement efforts for maternal mortality and morbidity. March for moms also held an enhancing community resilience workshop to amplify community-led solutions from community-based maternal health organizations in Kansas city, mo. Speakers from community-based organizations around the united states presented on innovative community-led solutions and programs to serve moms and families during the postpartum period.march for moms additionally held its first 2-day learning retreat in Washington, dc to support the work of black-led maternal health community-based organizations to engage in peer learning and facilitated capacity-building workshops.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 95
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 6
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 85.8%; rating input score 86
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -87.3%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.09; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.21; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 46.6%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -21.5% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -21.6% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 85.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $260K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 11/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 5/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 18/100.