March for Life
Legal name: March for Life Action
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 521059820
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2020
- Location
- Washington, D.C., USA
- Phone
- 202-234-3300
- Rating
- 45
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Right to Life
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $93,426
- Expenses
- $85,077
- Assets
- $110,661
- Liabilities
- $30,579
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JEANNE F MANCINI (PRESIDENT)
- JENNIFER BRADLEY LICHTER (PRESIDENT EL)
People named in this filing
- BILL WICHTERMAN (CHAIRMAN)
- JEANNE F MANCINI (PRESIDENT)
- JENNIFER BRADLEY LICHTER (PRESIDENT EL)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To make abortion unthinkable.
What it reported doing in 2024
Mfla regularly engaged in text, social media and email campaigns to educate pro-life americans about how they can make an impact on policies that impact the pro-life movement nationwide. In 2024, mfla also engaged in federal and state-level education of legislators and lobbying efforts to advance our legislative goals.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 74% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 5
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 52
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 5.8%; rating input score 6
- Program expense ratio: 4.3%; rating input score 4
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 8.9%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.3; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.28; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -121% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -32.9% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -58% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 5.8% of revenue deployed · 4.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $4K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 6/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 4/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 54/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 12/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.